Does the Bible condone slavery?

There is hardly a corner of the earth that hasn’t been touched by some or other form of slavery in the course of history, not least Africa.

Whether you consider the approximately 12 million Africans who were stolen from this continent in the time of the transatlantic slave trade, or the indigenous communities who were forced into slavery by European settlers, or the slaves who were brought here from elsewhere whose descendants live on in our communities, this continent has borne the brunt of humanity’s tendency for enslaving and exploiting.

These chapters of our history horrify us. Rightly so. And yet the evil of slavery still lingers in our world today. International Justice Mission estimates that there are currently 50 million people being held in modern forms of slavery worldwide.

When it comes to the Bible and slavery, many people fall into confusion. After all, while Christians have often been at the forefront of abolition movements, there have also been people who have tried to use the Bible to justify some of the harshest and most brutal forms of slavery in history. How is this possible? Doesn’t God explicitly condemn slavery in the Bible?

Surprisingly, no. Scripture doesn’t ignore the reality of slavery but there is no clear commandment from God to abolish it as an institution. Some may feel (as atheist philosopher, Sam Harris, does) that God’s silence suggests that He does condone slavery, making Him an unjust, unloving God who is unworthy of worship. But this view does not take the whole of Scripture, nor its context, into consideration.

IN HIS IMAGE

The very first chapter of the Bible establishes God’s attitude towards humanity. The creation narrative makes clear that every single human being, irrespective of race, gender or age, has equal dignity in God’s eyes because they are created in His image (Genesis 1:26-27). Though humanity’s corruption by sin does mar this image, it does not obliterate it (Genesis 5:1-2). Every human being since Adam and Eve has been valuable in the eyes of God.

 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”

So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
— Genesis 1:26-27

The creation narrative make clear not only humanity’s worth but also our purpose. We are the culmination of God’s creation, placed in the world not to be His slaves (as in the origin stories of other ancient religions) but as benevolent rulers over His creation. As Glen Scrivener writes in his book, The Air We Breathe, “Dominion, not subjection, is our lot. And our kind of dominion is meant to be a picture of God’s. In other words, it is meant to be power wielded for the benefit of those without it.”

God intended for all of humanity to rule benevolently over His creation. But the Fall happened, sin entered the world and slavery along with it. Before long, we find Israel’s great patriarch, Abraham, mistreating his slave-woman, Hagar, in defiance of God’s promise (Genesis 16). But the way in which God treats Hagar, the way He reassures her and graciously reveals Himself to her, sets the scene for God’s compassionate treatment of slaves in the Old Testament. And it is God’s view of slavery that the Bible wants us to take most seriously.

slavery in the old testament

It is very important to differentiate the forms of slavery which were common in the ancient Near-East from more recent forms such as the transatlantic slave trade. Slavery in Biblical times was not race-based, as it came to be in the seventeenth century. In the Old Testament, we encounter both an Egyptian woman enslaved by Hebrews (Genesis 16) and a Hebrew enslaved by Egyptians (Genesis 37).

Moreover, the law of Moses is very strict concerning the treatment of slaves (Exodus 21). The Israelites themselves were emancipated slaves and this experience was to inform the way they treated their own slaves (Deuteronomy 5:15, 15:15, 16:12, 24:18, 24:22). God’s law allows for voluntary servitude as a form of employment to keep someone from bankruptcy, but it does not allow man-stealing (this prohibition is repeated in the New Testament, 1 Timothy 1:9-11). The law also required slaves to rest on the Sabbath with their masters, Hebrew slaves were to be released after six years, and if any slave was permanently harmed by their master they were also to be released. Escaped slaves were to be given refuge (Deuteronomy 23:15).

Prisoners of war were also protected. Though it was common at the time for victorious soldiers to rape the women of the towns they conquered and keep them as sex-slaves, God’s law requires that such women be allowed time to mourn for their families and then any soldier who desires one of them should marry her, affording her permanent provision and a respectable position (Deuteronomy 21:10-14). 

All of this was radically counter-cultural and reveals a God who cares for the poor and the downtrodden. But is this enough? Why doesn’t God reject slavery altogether?

slavery in the NEw testament

At first glance, the New Testament doesn’t seem satisfactory either when it includes a letter from the Apostle Paul to a Christian slave-owner, Philemon. In the letter, Paul says that he is sending Philemon’s runaway slave, Onesimus, back to his master. Oh dear. Does Paul support slavery too? Far from it.

Slaves in the Roman world were considered property rather than people. And yet Paul refers to Onesimus as his son, his “very heart”. As Rebecca McLaughlin points out, this is the most affectionate language used of any individual Christian in all of Paul’s writings.

Paul also makes clear that he is sending Onesimus back to Philemon, “no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother.” Philemon should receive him “as you [Philemon] would welcome me [Paul].” This is a far cry from the brutal punishment usually administered to runaway slaves under Roman law.

And although Paul’s language is very gracious and entreating rather than commanding, Paul’s position of authority in the early church meant that Philemon could not disregard Paul’s requests without facing public dishonour. Paul was not messing around.

God’s law in the Old Testament afforded slaves rights, privileges and protection. The Apostle Paul’s attitude to slavery in the New Testament goes even further. Christian slaves and slave-owners were brothers in the Lord. How did Paul come to hold this view?

slave of all

In Philippians 2, Paul writes:

Though [Jesus] was God, he did not think of equality with God as something to cling to. Instead, he gave up his divine privileges; he took the humble position of a slave and was born as a human being. When he appeared in human form, he humbled himself in obedience to God and died a criminal’s death on a cross.
— Philippians 2:6-8 (NLT)

Jesus had said about himself, “Whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:43-45).

Paul’s God had come to earth, not for glory or status or to exploit, but to serve as a slave. And because of how Christ loved and served people by giving His life for them, His followers were to continue his example. Throughout his New Testament letters, Paul refers to himself and other Christians as slaves of Christ. This should not be taken as an endorsement of slavery. Rather, the point is that every Christian has equal standing before God and they should treat each other as such, with great humility (1 Corinthians 6:19-20Galatians 3:28).

The New Testament does not forbid slavery because no Christian at the time was in any position to change Roman law. But the early church was radical in their rejection of the abusive, hierachical structure which was so entrenched in Roman society at the time. This is evidenced in a surviving letter from a Roman governor, Pliny, to the Emperor Trajan, dated around 111-113 AD, in which we discover that slaves could be appointed deacons (leaders) of churches. And though it took time, the Church’s validation of every person’s inherent dignity before God began to impact the rest of the world.

christian opposition to slavery

For centuries, people held a view of humanity which was more heavily influenced by the ‘natural’ way of things. In nature, the strong eat the weak. Life is a case of ‘survival of the fittest’. Writing in the fourth century, Aristotle said, “For that some should rule and others be ruled is a thing not only necessary, but expedient; from the hour of their birth, some are marked out for subjection, others for rule.” To 21st century readers, this way of thinking is abominable. But at the time, it was normal. It is largely because Paul and the early church, and Christians who came after them, stood against slavery the way they did that reforms were gradually introduced which did away with slavery, first in the eleventh century, and later again in the nineteenth century.

Yes, there have been Christians in history, particularly white Christians, who were complicit in the slave-trade to a greater or lesser degree. There is no excusing this. But that relatively small group of people should not define the story of the global Church across the centuries. Christian history is overflowing with notable characters whose faith compelled them to oppose slavery and courageously campaign for abolition.

If you would like to read more about this, you could investigate the writings of fourth century theologians, Archbishop Chrysostom (ca. 347–407) and Gregory of Nyssa (ca. 335–ca. 395). In the the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Christians like William Wilberforce and African-born freeman, Olaudah Equiano, were hugely influential in bringing about the abolition of slavery in England. Nineteenth century minister, Charles Spurgeon, was detested in America because of his denunciation of slavery. Some of the doctrines in this article are best expressed by heroes of the African American church such as Amanda Berry Smith, Harriet Tubman, Henry Highland Garnet and Frederick Douglass. And of course, there are Christian organisations like International Justice Mission, Embers International and Love Justice International who are currently working to end modern day slavery. 

For further reading, have a look at Rebecca McLaughlin’s book, Confronting Christianity: 12 Hard Questions for the World's Largest Religion (Crossway).

Why do the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament appear to be so different?

It is not unusual for people with a second-hand knowledge of the Bible to believe that the Old and New Testaments portray two very different sides of God. From their point of view, the God of the Old Testament is wrathful and angry and the God of the New Testament is loving and gracious, almost as if they were two separate beings.

One can understand where the confusion comes from, especially given that the most famous Old Testament stories in popular culture involve bloodshed, judgement and war (e.g. the Flood, the Ten Plagues on Egypt, Samson and Delilah). Meanwhile, the New Testament revolves around the person of Christ who is best known for saying things like “blessed are the meek” and “love your enemies”. While on the surface this claim may seem plausible, a closer look at the Bible shows it is profoundly mistaken.

One of the most helpful things any serious reader of the Bible can do is to tear out the page in the middle that divides the Old and New Testaments. The Bible was always intended to be read as one story, and nowhere does it make the claim that it is describing two different Gods or even that the God of Noah, Moses and Samson has somehow changed or matured when we reach Matthew chapter 1. Indeed, Jesus’ brother, James, tells us that God is “the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows” (James 1:17; see also Malachi 3:6 and Psalm 102:25–27). The God of the Bible is everlasting, eternal and unchanging.

As a result, it is no surprise that God’s wrath which was poured out on various people in the Old Testament hasn’t dissipated when we reach the New Testament! The following verses may not appear on inspirational coffee mugs but they’re just as much a part of God-breathed Scripture as John 3:16 -

“This will happen when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven in blazing fire with his powerful angels. He will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might…” (2 Thessalonians 1:7-9)

“But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed.” (Romans 2:5)

“Then the Father will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.’” (Matthew 25:41)

The God who pours out his wrath against sin in the Old Testament is the same God who promises eternal punishment to those who do not accept his Son Jesus.

Similarly, though the love of God as described in such New Testament passages as John 3:16 (“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”) is more commonly acknowledged, is it true that the Old Testament does not describe God in this way?

One of the most important passages in the Old Testament for understanding God’s character is God’s revelation of himself to Moses in Exodus 34:

“And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, ‘The Lord, the Lord, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin.’”

Moreover, the psalms are full of praise to God for his love. Take Psalm 118, for example, in which the whole psalm revolves around the refrain, “His love endures forever.”

Read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation and it will become clear that there is one God who is eternal and unchanging and whose glorious attributes include his unfailing love and his terrifying wrath which stand alongside one another from beginning to end. Indeed, it could not be any other way. As Don Carson has said:

“God’s wrath is not an implacable blind rage. However emotional it may be, it is an entirely reasonable and willed response to offenses against His holiness. At the same time His love wells up amidst His perfections and is not generated by the loveliness of the loved. Thus there is nothing intrinsically impossible about wrath and love being directed toward the same individual or people at once. God in His perfections must be wrathful against His rebel image-bearers, for they have offended Him; God in His perfections must be loving toward His rebel image-bearers, for He is that kind of God.”
— Don Carson

Still confused? The New Testament teaches that the Jesus Christ is the perfect and final revelation of Almighty God. In the Prologue to John’s gospel, he writes:

“No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.” (John 1:18)

John wanted readers of his gospel to know that the God they had read about in the Old Testament had taken on flesh on walked among them so if they wanted to know what God was like, all they had to do was look at Jesus. If we’re struggling to see how God can be both loving and wrathful, or what the God of the Old Testament has to do with the God of the New Testament, there’s no better place to look for answers than the birth, life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ as recorded in the gospels.

And nowhere in history have the love and wrath of God been more clearly on display than at the cross. At the cross, the wrath of God for the sin of the whole world was poured out on our substitute, Jesus. At the same time, God’s love had led him to give his only, beloved Son to die in our place that we might be forgiven and restored to him.

Did Noah's Ark really happen?

Noah’s ark makes for an exciting children’s bedtime story, but surely Christians don’t really believe he actually crammed all the creatures of the world into a boat? Take a closer look at the details of the Biblical account and you may be surprised to find that the narrative emerges water-tight.

The Ark’s Structure

According to Genesis 6:15 (NIV), the dimensions of the boat were “450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high”. This is one of the more conservative estimates; some other Bible translations interpret the ancient cubit differently resulting in even large measurements! At any rate, this makes the ark longer than the pitch at Cape Town Stadium and certainly bigger than any other ancient sailing vessel. (In fact, it was only in 1858 that the ark’s record was broken by a ship named the Great Eastern, measuring 692 by 83 by 30 feet).

Great Eastern at Hearts Content, July 1866

Now consider the buoyancy and stability of such a structure. The raging flood and relentless rains described in Genesis 7 would certainly have been a formidable test for any vessel. And yet simulated tests show that a boxlike structure of these dimensions is exceedingly stable and almost impossible to capsize.

Where would an ordinary man in the ancient world like Noah have gained the scientific and engineering expertise to build such an unsinkable boat? According to the Biblical account, the design for the ark was given to Noah by God (Genesis 6:14-21). The idea of God communicating with a man might be difficult for contemporary readers to believe, but it is not a foreign occurrence in the book of Genesis or indeed in the Bible as a whole. And it makes logical sense that the God who (according to the Bible) made the world and authored the laws of physics would be able to design a structure that would survive even the most devastating natural disaster.

The Animals

What about the many species transported in the ark? This is another argument skeptics often level at the ark. Surely Noah couldn’t have fitted ALL those animals in there? The difficulty here is in determining what the Bible means by the word “kind” when it says that Noah gathered “two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground” (Genesis 6:20). Does “kind” refer to our modern classification of “family” or “species”?

If the text is referring to the slightly broader category of families of animals, the maximum number of families represented on the ark would be about seven hundred. If the text is referring to individual species, the number would be much higher—but still not beyond the ark’s capacity given that there are many kinds of animals which would not have needed to be housed on the ark (e.g. fish, tunicates, echinoderms, mollusks, coelenterates, sponges, protozoans, most arthropods, and most worms). 

Furthermore, most land animals tend to be rather small. Though the pictures of Noah’s ark in children’s books tend to feature all the large animals (e.g. elephants, hippopotamuses, giraffes), the average size of land animals is less than that of a sheep. Now for some calculations. When sheep are transported by rail, it is common to fit 240 sheep comfortably into an average size two-deck stock car. The volume of the ark would have been equal to 569 stock cars. As a result, the animals Noah saved would only have taken up approximately 50 percent of the ark’s carrying capacity. This would have left plenty of room for people, food, water, and whatever other provisions may have been necessary to sustain everyone during the voyage.

Archaeological Evidence

Even if the numbers add up, is there any archeological evidence to support the existence of the ark? The Bible speaks of the ark coming to rest on Mount Ararat as the floodwaters were receding (Genesis 8:4). It was on this spot that Noah and his family and all the animals departed the ark and it seems the imposing structure remained on the mountain in modern day Turkey. A number of historical records from different centuries testify to the existence of the ark’s remains, giving further weight to the reliability of the Bible’s account.

Ancient historians who refer to the ark include Berosus (a Babylonian historian writing in approximately 275 B.C.), Josephus (a Jewish historian, writing a generation after Christ), Hieronymus (an Egyptian historian), Nicolas of Damascus, and Theophilus of Antioch (180 A.D.).

In the 19th and 20th centuries, several explorers embarked on reportedly successful expeditions to the ark, some travellers even returning with photographs that seem to depict a snow-covered ark-like structure on the mountainside. These explorers include an Armenian named Haji Yearam (1856), a British statesman named Viscount James Bryce (1876), Prince Nouri (the archdeacon of the church of Babylon who claimed to have seen the ark in 1887) and six Turkish soldiers (1916). In the 1930s, Hardwicke Knight (a British archeologist) found interlocking timbers at a height of 14,000 feet and less than ten years later, American aviators flying over Ararat photographed the ark site and had the photos printed in the American military newspaper, Stars and Stripes.

The eyewitness testimonies of various people over many years seem to support the existence of the ark but some may still question whether they prove the historicity of the Biblical account, as supposed to one of the 211 other versions of the flood event which exist in various cultural traditions.

in jesus’ words

Ultimately, in order to discredit the account of Noah’s ark in Genesis, one would have to discredit the words of Jesus’ himself as recorded in the New Testament by Matthew, an eyewitness to Jesus’ ministry:

“As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.”

It’s one thing to write off the flood account as exaggerated and unsubstantiated by evidence; it is a lot harder to write off the New Testament accounts of the life and words of Jesus. The New Testament is objectively the most trustworthy ancient document that has been passed down to us, having survived in more copies and in a purer form than any other significant work. Its reliability is unquestioned by serious scholars. It would be foolish not to take it seriously.

Matthew 24:37-41 indicates that Jesus not only believed in the historicity of the flood but also taught that it has implications for future generations. He saw the flood as a precedent for the universal judgement to come and as a warning that we would do well to heed. But will you?

Noah’s ark truly was a marvel of engineering far ahead of its time which continues to provoke many discussions about the Bible’s integrity. A closer examination of the details of the ark’s construction serves to reaffirm the historicity of the account, and yet to focus on the plausibility of the ark itself and forget the rest of the story is to miss the entire reason it has been included in the Bible! Noah’s ark is a story of coming judgement. It is also a story of grace and salvation and faithfulness. Why not read the whole of Genesis 6:5-9:17 asking what the author intended for us to learn about God’s character, and you’ll discover treasures you’d never seen before.

Bibliography:

Boice, J. M. (1998). Genesis: An Expositional Commentary. Baker Publishing Group.

Why is the virgin birth so important?

The doctrine of the virgin birth is central to the Christian gospel, yet many find it odd that Christians believe something that is so clearly at odds with basic science. God designed humans to procreate through intercourse, so how could Mary give brith to Jesus if she was still a virgin? The Bible certainly doesn’t shy away from the claim that she did (Matthew 1:23; Luke 1:26,27, 34) and there are two primary reasons why this claim is important:

The first is that Jesus being born of a virgin affirms his eternality. The New Testament speaks of Jesus being sent to earth from God, which tells us that he existed before he was born as a human baby. The Apostle Paul writes in Galatians 4:4: “God sent His Son, born of a woman.” John 1:14 says that Jesus’s birth was the means by which the Word (John’s name for Jesus), which was already in existence, became flesh. In other words, Jesus was no ordinary baby and his existence didn’t begin in Mary’s womb. So it makes sense that he didn’t need to be conceived in the same way that normal babies do.

The other reason for the virgin birth is Jesus’ divinity. Jesus was God’s Son, and as such, he didn’t have a human father in the way the rest of us do. Luke says in his gospel that Jesus was “the son (as was supposed) of Joseph” (Luke 3:23, ESV). When Matthew is describing Jesus’ family tree, he doesn’t speak of Joseph as Jesus’ father; instead he writes: “Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah” (Matthew 1:16). The fact that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary proves that He really is God’s Son.

Furthermore, because Joseph was not Jesus’ biological father, Jesus didn’t inherit Joseph’s sinful nature (Hebrews 7:26). Rather, he retained his sinless, divine, eternal, holy nature that he had had from all eternity past while receiving a proper human, physical body from his mother, Mary. The virgin birth meant that the Incarnated Christ could be fully God and fully man at the same time.

The virgin birth may seem unscientific (as might all of Jesus’ miracles mentioned in the gospels). But why is it so ridiculous to believe that the God who created the entire world and wove the laws of science into the fabric of the universe could operate outside those laws on certain occasions for his own special purposes?

In this case, the virgin birth shows God’s initiative in the salvation story. Jesus’ birth was entirely a work of God’s power, which is completely consistent with the Bible’s teaching on how God works in people’s lives today. Anyone who comes to faith in Christ does so as a result of God’s gracious and powerful initiative. There has never been any other way.

The virgin birth tells us a lot about Jesus. It also tells us a lot about salvation and the way God works throughout history. And if you would like know more about either of those things, we would love for you to visit one of our Sunday services.

Why does God care who I sleep with?

The British evolutionary biologist and author, Richard Dawkins, participated in a debate in Oxford in 2008 in which he said, “You could persuade me that there was a God who created everything but this is incompatible with a God who cares about your sin, what you do with your genitals, and what you think about.”

Many people today would go further than Dawkins, saying that a person’s sex life is a vital expression of their true, authentic self and anything or anyone who opposes that self-expression (including the God of the Bible) is unloving and even dangerous. Underlying this view is the modern belief that all of our natural thoughts and desires (sexual and otherwise) are fundamentally good. Perhaps you share this reasoning.

And yet, how many of us would want all of our innermost thoughts and desires to be recorded and replayed for our friends? Can any of us honestly say that we would be comfortable having all of our private opinions aired publicly? Probably not, because we know that as well as thoughts of kindness or compassion, we also have ugly thoughts that we’re ashamed of, thoughts that are judgemental, self-centred, condescending or arrogant.

Jesus knows this about us. He once said: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person” (Mark 7:20-23). Maybe this sounds like a harsh assessment. But the point Jesus is making is that every person born into this world is broken in some way. And this has an impact on our sexual desires.

The surprising thing is that Jesus knows all of this about us and yet he chose to die for us anyway. What does that mean? It means that God is for sexually broken people (which is all of us).

Is it fair, then, to accuse God of being unloving or dangerous because He cares about who we sleep with? If we agree with the Bible, that not every desire we experience is necessarily good, then the fact that God wants to put boundaries around who we sleep with makes Him loving, not unloving. And as Creator and Designer, He alone has perfect knowledge of what is best for us.

So what does our Creator and Designer say about sex? In the Bible, sex is something that is given (not taken) in the context of a permanent, male-female marriage. And when we look into the Bible’s primary reason for this ‘restrictive’ (as many people would see it) view of sex, what emerges is actually weirder than you might think.

The reason God says what He does about sex is that it has spiritual significance as a picture of the unity and love between Jesus and Christians. In other words, Christian marriage is a signpost. The very best romantic relationship on earth is only a tiny echo of Jesus’ love for his Church. And that love is permanent, binding, and extraordinary sacrificial.

There’s a lot that might sound confusing here and that’s because what God says about our bodies, about marriage and about singleness doesn’t make much sense until we understand who God is. So if you’re reading this because you’re engaging in sexual activity that the Bible disagrees with and it’s keeping you from visiting church or exploring Christianity, please be assured that no one at our church is going to interrogate you about your personal life. We would love it if you would accept this invitation to come along to one of our Sunday services to hear more about the God of the Bible. Because He might not be who you think He is.

Aren't all religions essentially the same?

There’s a traditional story about an elephant and a few blind men that goes something like this:

Three blind men came across an elephant and began to touch it so that they could figure out what it was.  The one touching the elephant’s leg described it as a tree. The one touching the tail described it as a rope. The third man who touched the elephant’s trunk described it as a snake.[1]

Some people say religion is like the blind men who are all describing one true reality from their own unique perspective or experience. We are all fumbling in the dark, doing our best to describe the same enormous creature. No one religion can claim to be more true than the others.

This perspective has a flaw. The interpreter of this story is claiming that they have seen something the blind men haven’t. They’ve seen the whole elephant! And so they know how the blind men’s descriptions fall short. On what authority can they claim such breadth of insight? This in itself is a claim to have found THE truth.

When it comes to comparing different world religions, one very quickly discovers that there are many points on which they do not agree. The God of the Quran ‘is far above having a son’ (Sura 4:171), but one of the most famous verses in the Bible says, ‘For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,’ (John 3:16). These gods are clearly not the same.

And according to the Bible, the gods of other religions are real, supernatural beings who love to be worshipped and want to deceive the world in order to take the place of the one true God. The very first commandment God gives to His people is, “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:30). The gods of other religions are not the same as the God of the Bible. They are competitors. They are enemies.

The God of the Bible is unique. And the Bible itself offers you more than just a ‘best guess’ at whatever spiritual reality is really governing the universe. God hasn’t left us to fumble around in the dark. The Bible is the very Word of God, spoken and recorded for us so that we could know Him for ourselves. And God sent His Son, Jesus, God in the flesh, as the perfect revelation of Himself. “We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

If you’re serious about finding the truth, come along to one of our Sunday services.

[1] The story occurs in many forms and appears to have Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic and Jain versions. In the nineteenth century, American poet John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887) put it into verse and it is probably this version which is best known today. It can be accessed from here.

I’ve had some bad experiences with church, so why should I give Christianity another chance?

Firstly, I am so sorry if this has been your experience. It is a sad reality that church hurt is one of the most common objections to Christianity. If you (or a loved one) have witnessed or experienced hypocrisy, unkindness, abuse, betrayal, fraud, or humiliation at the hands of church-goers, I am so sorry. That should not have happened. Church is meant to be a safe place where people are loved and accepted, and if your experience was different, I can understand that must have been deeply disappointing and discouraging, especially if it happened more than once.

One of the fundamental truths of the Christian faith is that all people are broken and deeply flawed. Jesus once said, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mark 2:17). Jesus came for messed-up, broken people. He is the friend of sinners. And when sinners come to faith in Christ and receive forgiveness, it doesn’t put a stop to their potential to sin.

This may come as a surprise to people who have the impression that Christianity is for perfect people. It’s not. The Church is a bunch of misfits. Sometimes even Christians fall into the trap of thinking they need to make themselves out to be perfect when they’re not. Jesus is not pleased with hypocrisy. And if any Christian has ever claimed moral superiority over you, they were mistaken.

But if you stick around and get to know us over the long-term, we hope you’ll see the transformation that Jesus is working in each of us who have trusted in Him for forgiveness. This side of heaven, we will never achieve the standard of moral perfection set by our Saviour, Jesus. But we’re not who we once were. He is making all things new.

If you have fallen out with a church due to a negative experience, it is worth considering whether those encounters were with one or two people or with the whole church. Were there other people in the church, besides those who hurt you, who loved you, encouraged you and prayed for you? Are you willing to hold the whole church in condemnation, and in the process, cut yourself off from other precious relationships, when in fact, your bitterness might be misplaced? The gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ brings reconciliation and healing and builds community in ways that you might never have imagined possible.

Lastly, if you were hurt by someone who claimed to be a Christian in a way that constitutes abuse, please know that the Lord Jesus stands defiantly against abuse in all its forms. Know that justice will be done and that it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Please do contact our church office if you would like to speak to a member of the pastoral team about your experience.